Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code using frequency generation" » "coder code using frequency regulation" (Expand search), "coder code using frequency modulation" (Expand search), "coder code using frequency estimation" (Expand search), "coder code single frequency generation" (Expand search), "coder code feeding frequency generation" (Expand search), "coder code grazing frequency generation" (Expand search), "code code using frequency generation" (Expand search), "modern code using frequency generation" (Expand search), "color code using frequency generation" (Expand search), "coder made using frequency generation" (Expand search), "coder coding using frequency generation" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code using frequency generation\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code using frequency generation ) OR ( api python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code using frequency generation") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.