Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code using frequency annotation" » "coder code using sequence annotation" (Expand search), "coder code using frequency allocation" (Expand search), "coder code using frequency generation" (Expand search), "coder code single frequency annotation" (Expand search), "coder code feeding frequency annotation" (Expand search), "coder code grazing frequency annotation" (Expand search), "code code using frequency annotation" (Expand search), "modern code using frequency annotation" (Expand search), "color code using frequency annotation" (Expand search), "coder made using frequency annotation" (Expand search), "coder coding using frequency annotation" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code using frequency annotation\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code using frequency annotation ) OR ( api python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code using frequency annotation") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.