Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code using fragmentation et" » "coder code using segmentation et" (Expand search), "coder code in fragmentation et" (Expand search), "coder code using augmentation et" (Expand search), "coder code using fragmentation of" (Expand search), "coder code using fragmentation in" (Expand search), "coder code using fragmentation on" (Expand search), "code code using fragmentation et" (Expand search), "modern code using fragmentation et" (Expand search), "color code using fragmentation et" (Expand search), "coder made using fragmentation et" (Expand search), "coder coding using fragmentation et" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code using fragmentation et\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code using fragmentation et ) OR ( api python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code using fragmentation et") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.