Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code using eeg introduction" » "coder code using bees introduction" (Expand search), "coder code using eyes introduction" (Expand search), "coder code using ed introduction" (Expand search), "code code using eeg introduction" (Expand search), "modern code using eeg introduction" (Expand search), "color code using eeg introduction" (Expand search), "coder made using eeg introduction" (Expand search), "coder coding using eeg introduction" (Expand search), "coder code using energy introduction" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code using eeg introduction\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code using eeg introduction ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code using eeg introduction") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.