Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code using conductive processing" » "coder code using conductive processes" (Expand search), "coder code using cognitive processing" (Expand search), "coder code using predictive processing" (Expand search), "coder code in conductive processing" (Expand search), "coder code using collective processing" (Expand search), "coder code using reductive processing" (Expand search), "code code using conductive processing" (Expand search), "modern code using conductive processing" (Expand search), "color code using conductive processing" (Expand search), "coder made using conductive processing" (Expand search), "coder coding using conductive processing" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code using conductive processing\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code using conductive processing ) OR ( api python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code using conductive processing") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.