Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code using coat processing" » "coder code using coal processing" (Expand search), "coder code using post processing" (Expand search), "coder code using meat processing" (Expand search), "code code using coat processing" (Expand search), "modern code using coat processing" (Expand search), "color code using coat processing" (Expand search), "coder made using coat processing" (Expand search), "coder coding using coat processing" (Expand search), "coder code using coated processing" (Expand search), "coder code using cobalt processing" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder code using coat processing") OR ("api python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code using coat processing\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code using coat processing ) OR ( api python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code using coat processing") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.