Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code procedural implications programming" » "coder code procedural applications programming" (Expand search), "coder code procedural application programming" (Expand search), "coder code procedural application programing" (Expand search), "coder code procedural obligations programming" (Expand search), "coder code practical implications programming" (Expand search), "coder code structural implications programming" (Expand search), "coder codes procedural implications programming" (Expand search), "coder code procedure implications programming" (Expand search), "coder some procedural implications programming" (Expand search), "code code procedural implications programming" (Expand search), "modern code procedural implications programming" (Expand search), "color code procedural implications programming" (Expand search)
"api pitoes python python programming" » "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitoes pythons python programming" (Expand search), "api pitoes piton python programming" (Expand search), "api pitoes pitons python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder code procedural implications programming") OR ("api pitoes python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code procedural implications programming\") OR (\"api pitoes python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code procedural implications programming ) OR ( api pitoes python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code procedural implications programming") OR ("api pitoes python python programming"))*.