Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code linearization algorithm in" » "coder code linearization algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder code localization algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder code realization algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder model linearization algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder and linearization algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder the linearization algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder code linearization algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder code linearization algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder code linearization algorithm with" (Expand search), "code code linearization algorithm in" (Expand search), "modern code linearization algorithm in" (Expand search), "color code linearization algorithm in" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder code linearization algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code linearization algorithm in\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code linearization algorithm in ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code linearization algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.