Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code in sequential data" » "coder code in sequential batch" (Expand search), "coder code in sequential art" (Expand search), "coder code in sequential and" (Expand search), "coder code and sequential data" (Expand search), "coder code _ sequential data" (Expand search), "coder code of sequential data" (Expand search), "code code in sequential data" (Expand search), "modern code in sequential data" (Expand search), "color code in sequential data" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code in sequential data\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code in sequential data ) OR ( on python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code in sequential data") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.