Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code coverage using prony" » "coder code coverage in prony" (Expand search), "coder code coverage among prony" (Expand search), "coder code cover using prony" (Expand search), "coder care coverage using prony" (Expand search), "coder and coverage using prony" (Expand search), "coder the coverage using prony" (Expand search), "coder code coverage using proxy" (Expand search), "coder code coverage using prins" (Expand search), "coder code coverage using proc" (Expand search), "code code coverage using prony" (Expand search), "modern code coverage using prony" (Expand search), "color code coverage using prony" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coverage using prony\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coverage using prony ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code coverage using prony") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.