Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code coverage that function" » "coder care coverage that function" (Expand search), "coder and coverage that function" (Expand search), "coder the coverage that function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage the function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage at function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage test function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage graft function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage heart function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage cost function" (Expand search), "code code coverage that function" (Expand search), "modern code coverage that function" (Expand search), "color code coverage that function" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coverage that function\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coverage that function ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code coverage that function") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.