Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code coverage stimulative function" » "coder code coverage estimation function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage relative function" (Expand search), "coder code forage stimulation function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage legislative function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage normative function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage stimulus function" (Expand search), "coder care coverage stimulative function" (Expand search), "coder and coverage stimulative function" (Expand search), "coder the coverage stimulative function" (Expand search), "code code coverage stimulative function" (Expand search), "modern code coverage stimulative function" (Expand search), "color code coverage stimulative function" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coverage stimulative function\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coverage stimulative function ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code coverage stimulative function") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.