Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder code coverage set function" » "coder care coverage set function" (Expand search), "coder and coverage set function" (Expand search), "coder the coverage set function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage at function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage bed function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage not function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage set functions" (Expand search), "coder code coverage islet function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage sets functions" (Expand search), "code code coverage set function" (Expand search), "modern code coverage set function" (Expand search), "color code coverage set function" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder code coverage set function") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coverage set function\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coverage set function ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code coverage set function") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.