Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code coverage reported function" » "coder code coverage report function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage related function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage exposed function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage reported functional" (Expand search), "coder code coverage regulated function" (Expand search), "coder care coverage reported function" (Expand search), "coder and coverage reported function" (Expand search), "coder the coverage reported function" (Expand search), "code code coverage reported function" (Expand search), "modern code coverage reported function" (Expand search), "color code coverage reported function" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coverage reported function\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coverage reported function ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code coverage reported function") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.