Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code coverage reduction function" » "coder code coverage prediction function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage predictions function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage detection function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage production function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage reaction function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage education function" (Expand search), "coder care coverage reduction function" (Expand search), "coder and coverage reduction function" (Expand search), "coder the coverage reduction function" (Expand search), "code code coverage reduction function" (Expand search), "modern code coverage reduction function" (Expand search), "color code coverage reduction function" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coverage reduction function\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coverage reduction function ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code coverage reduction function") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.