Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code coverage putative functions" » "coder code coverage putative functional" (Expand search), "coder code coverage punitive function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage positive functions" (Expand search), "coder code coverage relative functions" (Expand search), "coder code coverage integrative functions" (Expand search), "coder care coverage putative functions" (Expand search), "coder and coverage putative functions" (Expand search), "coder the coverage putative functions" (Expand search), "code code coverage putative functions" (Expand search), "modern code coverage putative functions" (Expand search), "color code coverage putative functions" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder code coverage putative functions") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coverage putative functions\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coverage putative functions ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.