Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code coverage predicting function" » "coder code coverage predictions function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage prediction function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage writing function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage predicting functions" (Expand search), "coder code coverage mediating function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage predicted function" (Expand search), "coder care coverage predicting function" (Expand search), "coder and coverage predicting function" (Expand search), "coder the coverage predicting function" (Expand search), "code code coverage predicting function" (Expand search), "modern code coverage predicting function" (Expand search), "color code coverage predicting function" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder code coverage predicting function") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coverage predicting function\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coverage predicting function ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code coverage predicting function") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.