Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code coverage predicted function" » "coder code average predicted function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage prediction function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage produced function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage predicted functions" (Expand search), "coder code coverage predicted functional" (Expand search), "coder code coverage predicting function" (Expand search), "coder care coverage predicted function" (Expand search), "coder and coverage predicted function" (Expand search), "coder the coverage predicted function" (Expand search), "code code coverage predicted function" (Expand search), "modern code coverage predicted function" (Expand search), "color code coverage predicted function" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder code coverage predicted function") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coverage predicted function\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coverage predicted function ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code coverage predicted function") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.