Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code coverage on functionally" » "coder code coverage of functionally" (Expand search), "coder code coverage in functionally" (Expand search), "coder code coverage and functionally" (Expand search), "coder care coverage on functionally" (Expand search), "coder and coverage on functionally" (Expand search), "coder the coverage on functionally" (Expand search), "code code coverage on functionally" (Expand search), "modern code coverage on functionally" (Expand search), "color code coverage on functionally" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coverage on functionally\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coverage on functionally ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code coverage on functionally") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.