Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code coverage modeling function" » "coder code average modeling function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage models function" (Expand search), "coder code cover modeling function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage modelo function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage modeling fractional" (Expand search), "coder code coverage modeling connection" (Expand search), "coder care coverage modeling function" (Expand search), "coder and coverage modeling function" (Expand search), "coder the coverage modeling function" (Expand search), "code code coverage modeling function" (Expand search), "modern code coverage modeling function" (Expand search), "color code coverage modeling function" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder code coverage modeling function") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coverage modeling function\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coverage modeling function ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))*.