Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code coverage making objects" » "coder code coverage among objects" (Expand search), "coder code coverage using objects" (Expand search), "coder code coverage during objects" (Expand search), "coder code coverage talking objects" (Expand search), "coder code coverage imaging objects" (Expand search), "coder code coverage moving objects" (Expand search), "coder care coverage making objects" (Expand search), "coder and coverage making objects" (Expand search), "coder the coverage making objects" (Expand search), "code code coverage making objects" (Expand search), "modern code coverage making objects" (Expand search), "color code coverage making objects" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coverage making objects\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coverage making objects ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code coverage making objects") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.