Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code coverage location functions" » "coder code coverage locomotion functions" (Expand search), "coder code coverage allocation function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage locution functional" (Expand search), "coder code covering location functions" (Expand search), "coder code coverage ratio functions" (Expand search), "coder code storage location functions" (Expand search), "coder care coverage location functions" (Expand search), "coder and coverage location functions" (Expand search), "coder the coverage location functions" (Expand search), "code code coverage location functions" (Expand search), "modern code coverage location functions" (Expand search), "color code coverage location functions" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder code coverage location functions") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coverage location functions\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coverage location functions ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.