Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code coverage location function" » "coder code covering location function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage ratio function" (Expand search), "coder code storage location function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage allocation function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage locution functional" (Expand search), "coder code coverage education function" (Expand search), "coder care coverage location function" (Expand search), "coder and coverage location function" (Expand search), "coder the coverage location function" (Expand search), "code code coverage location function" (Expand search), "modern code coverage location function" (Expand search), "color code coverage location function" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder code coverage location function") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coverage location function\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coverage location function ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code coverage location function") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.