Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code coverage into object" » "coder care coverage into object" (Expand search), "coder and coverage into object" (Expand search), "coder the coverage into object" (Expand search), "coder code coverage onto object" (Expand search), "coder code coverage in object" (Expand search), "coder code coverage its object" (Expand search), "coder code coverage into objects" (Expand search), "coder code coverage to object" (Expand search), "coder code coverage into objective" (Expand search), "code code coverage into object" (Expand search), "modern code coverage into object" (Expand search), "color code coverage into object" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder code coverage into object") OR ("api python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coverage into object\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coverage into object ) OR ( api python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code coverage into object") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.