Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code coverage information function" » "coder code average information function" (Expand search), "coder code cover geoinformation function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage innovation function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage informational function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage formation function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage informative function" (Expand search), "coder care coverage information function" (Expand search), "coder and coverage information function" (Expand search), "coder the coverage information function" (Expand search), "code code coverage information function" (Expand search), "modern code coverage information function" (Expand search), "color code coverage information function" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coverage information function\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coverage information function ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code coverage information function") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.