Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code coverage increases function" » "coder code coverage increases functional" (Expand search), "coder code coverage increased functional" (Expand search), "coder code coverage increase functional" (Expand search), "coder care coverage increases function" (Expand search), "coder and coverage increases function" (Expand search), "coder the coverage increases function" (Expand search), "code code coverage increases function" (Expand search), "modern code coverage increases function" (Expand search), "color code coverage increases function" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coverage increases function\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coverage increases function ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code coverage increases function") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.