Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code coverage in programmers" » "coder code coverage in programmes" (Expand search), "coder code coverage non programmers" (Expand search), "coder code coverage and programmers" (Expand search), "coder care coverage in programmers" (Expand search), "coder and coverage in programmers" (Expand search), "coder the coverage in programmers" (Expand search), "coder code coverage of programmers" (Expand search), "code code coverage in programmers" (Expand search), "modern code coverage in programmers" (Expand search), "color code coverage in programmers" (Expand search)
"_ pythons python python programming" » "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coverage in programmers\") OR (\"_ pythons python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coverage in programmers ) OR ( _ pythons python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code coverage in programmers") OR ("_ pythons python python programming"))*.