Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code coverage from object" » "coder care coverage from object" (Expand search), "coder and coverage from object" (Expand search), "coder the coverage from object" (Expand search), "coder code beverage from object" (Expand search), "coder code coverage of object" (Expand search), "coder code coverage on object" (Expand search), "coder code coverage from objects" (Expand search), "coder code coverage from objective" (Expand search), "coder code coverage from subjects" (Expand search), "code code coverage from object" (Expand search), "modern code coverage from object" (Expand search), "color code coverage from object" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coverage from object\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coverage from object ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code coverage from object") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.