Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code coverage estimating functions" » "coder code coverage estimating equations" (Expand search), "coder code coverage generating functions" (Expand search), "coder code coverage estimating equation" (Expand search), "coder code coverage estimation functions" (Expand search), "coder care coverage estimating functions" (Expand search), "coder and coverage estimating functions" (Expand search), "coder the coverage estimating functions" (Expand search), "code code coverage estimating functions" (Expand search), "modern code coverage estimating functions" (Expand search), "color code coverage estimating functions" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder code coverage estimating functions") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coverage estimating functions\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coverage estimating functions ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code coverage estimating functions") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.