Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code coverage detection function" » "coder code coverage prediction function" (Expand search), "coder code voltage detection function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage detection functions" (Expand search), "coder code coverage selection function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage retention function" (Expand search), "coder care coverage detection function" (Expand search), "coder and coverage detection function" (Expand search), "coder the coverage detection function" (Expand search), "code code coverage detection function" (Expand search), "modern code coverage detection function" (Expand search), "color code coverage detection function" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder code coverage detection function") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coverage detection function\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coverage detection function ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))*.