Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code coverage data function" » "coder care coverage data function" (Expand search), "coder and coverage data function" (Expand search), "coder the coverage data function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage path function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage at function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage and function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage delta function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage zeta function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage beta function" (Expand search), "code code coverage data function" (Expand search), "modern code coverage data function" (Expand search), "color code coverage data function" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder code coverage data function") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coverage data function\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coverage data function ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.