Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code coverage convolution functions" » "coder code coverage correlation functions" (Expand search), "coder code coverage contraction functions" (Expand search), "coder code coverage composition functions" (Expand search), "coder code coverage calculation functions" (Expand search), "coder code coverage conditions functions" (Expand search), "coder code coverage innovation functions" (Expand search), "coder care coverage convolution functions" (Expand search), "coder and coverage convolution functions" (Expand search), "coder the coverage convolution functions" (Expand search), "code code coverage convolution functions" (Expand search), "modern code coverage convolution functions" (Expand search), "color code coverage convolution functions" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder code coverage convolution functions") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coverage convolution functions\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coverage convolution functions ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.