Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code coverage allocation function" » "coder code coverage location function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage calculation function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage calibration function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage allocation induction" (Expand search), "coder code coverage activation function" (Expand search), "coder care coverage allocation function" (Expand search), "coder and coverage allocation function" (Expand search), "coder the coverage allocation function" (Expand search), "code code coverage allocation function" (Expand search), "modern code coverage allocation function" (Expand search), "color code coverage allocation function" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder code coverage allocation function") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coverage allocation function\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coverage allocation function ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.