Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code coverage affects objects" » "coder code cover effects objects" (Expand search), "coder code cover affect objects" (Expand search), "coder code coverage access objects" (Expand search), "coder code coverage affective objects" (Expand search), "coder code coverage artifacts objects" (Expand search), "coder code coverage affected subjects" (Expand search), "coder care coverage affects objects" (Expand search), "coder and coverage affects objects" (Expand search), "coder the coverage affects objects" (Expand search), "code code coverage affects objects" (Expand search), "modern code coverage affects objects" (Expand search), "color code coverage affects objects" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coverage affects objects\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coverage affects objects ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code coverage affects objects") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.