Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder code coding shell scripts" » "coder code coding shell script" (Expand search), "coder code coding sex scripts" (Expand search), "coder code coding scheme scripts" (Expand search), "coder code coating shelf scripts" (Expand search), "coder code fouling shell scripts" (Expand search), "coder code cloning shell scripts" (Expand search), "coder code codigo shell scripts" (Expand search), "coder code according shell scripts" (Expand search), "code code coding shell scripts" (Expand search), "modern code coding shell scripts" (Expand search), "color code coding shell scripts" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder code coding shell scripts") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code coding shell scripts\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code coding shell scripts ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code coding shell scripts") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.