Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder code are efficient coding" » "coder code are efficient routing" (Expand search), "coder code are efficient cement" (Expand search), "coder code more efficient coding" (Expand search), "coder code are sufficient coding" (Expand search), "coder code an efficient coding" (Expand search), "code code are efficient coding" (Expand search), "modern code are efficient coding" (Expand search), "color code are efficient coding" (Expand search), "coder code art efficient coding" (Expand search), "coder code and efficient coding" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder code are efficient coding") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder code are efficient coding\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder code are efficient coding ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder code are efficient coding") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.