Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder based allocation algorithm in" » "coder based selection algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder based detection algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder based evolution algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder based location algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder bed allocation algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder based application algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder based allocation algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder based allocation algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder based allocation algorithm with" (Expand search), "code based allocation algorithm in" (Expand search), "foder based allocation algorithm in" (Expand search), "codec based allocation algorithm in" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder based allocation algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder based allocation algorithm in\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder based allocation algorithm in ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder based allocation algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.