Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder augmentation _ lingual programming" » "coder augmentation _ lineal programming" (Expand search), "coder augmentation _ language programming" (Expand search), "coder augmentation _ linear programming" (Expand search), "bone augmentation _ lingual programming" (Expand search), "after augmentation _ lingual programming" (Expand search), "index augmentation _ lingual programming" (Expand search)
"python in python python programming" » "python in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "python in piton python programming" (Expand search), "python in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "python and python python programming" (Expand search), "python _ python python programming" (Expand search), "python c python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder augmentation _ lingual programming") OR ("python in python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder augmentation _ lingual programming\") OR (\"python in python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder augmentation _ lingual programming ) OR ( python in python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder augmentation _ lingual programming") OR ("python in python python programming"))*.