Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder application evolution algorithm in" » "coder application evaluation algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder application solution algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder applications evaluation algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder application evolutionary algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder application evolutionary algorithms in" (Expand search), "code application evolution algorithm in" (Expand search), "codes application evolution algorithm in" (Expand search), "powder application evolution algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder application evolution algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder application evolution algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder application evolution algorithm with" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder application evolution algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder application evolution algorithm in\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder application evolution algorithm in ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder application evolution algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.