Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder annotation using evolving program" » "code annotations using evolving program" (Expand search), "video annotation using evolving program" (Expand search), "user annotation using evolving program" (Expand search), "coder annotation in evolving program" (Expand search), "coder adaptation using evolving program" (Expand search), "coder annotation and evolving program" (Expand search), "coder annotation using solving program" (Expand search), "coder annotation using living program" (Expand search), "coder annotation using moving program" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder annotation using evolving program") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder annotation using evolving program\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder annotation using evolving program ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder annotation using evolving program") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.