Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder annotation in method process" » "code annotations in method process" (Expand search), "video annotation in method process" (Expand search), "user annotation in method process" (Expand search), "coder annotation in method processo" (Expand search), "coder annotation in methods process" (Expand search), "coder annotation in method processing" (Expand search), "coder annotation and method process" (Expand search), "coder annotation of method process" (Expand search), "coder annotation cn method process" (Expand search), "coder annotation chain method process" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder annotation in method process") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder annotation in method process\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder annotation in method process ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.