Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder annotation based method processing" » "coder annotation based seafood processing" (Expand search), "coder annotation based food processing" (Expand search), "coder annotation based seed processing" (Expand search), "code annotations based method processing" (Expand search), "video annotation based method processing" (Expand search), "user annotation based method processing" (Expand search), "coder innovation based method processing" (Expand search), "coder annotation and method processing" (Expand search), "coder annotation system method processing" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder annotation based method processing") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder annotation based method processing\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder annotation based method processing ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.