Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder and objective algorithm in" » "coder and objective algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder and multiobjective algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder and competitive algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder and subjective algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder and object algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder and objective algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder and objective algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder and objective algorithm with" (Expand search), "code and objective algorithm in" (Expand search), "codes and objective algorithm in" (Expand search), "poder and objective algorithm in" (Expand search)
"in picos python python programming" » "in picos pythons python programming" (Expand search), "in picos piton python programming" (Expand search), "in picos pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pacote python python programming" (Expand search), "in pieces python python programming" (Expand search), "in pigs python python programming" (Expand search), "in pinus python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder and objective algorithm in") OR ("in picos python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder and objective algorithm in\") OR (\"in picos python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder and objective algorithm in ) OR ( in picos python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder and objective algorithm in") OR ("in picos python python programming"))*.