Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder and object algorithm in" » "coder and objective algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder and objets algorithme in" (Expand search), "coder and direct algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder and object algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder and object algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder and object algorithm with" (Expand search), "coder an object algorithm in" (Expand search), "code and object algorithm in" (Expand search), "codes and object algorithm in" (Expand search), "poder and object algorithm in" (Expand search)
"in pythons python python programming" » "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pybthon python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder and object algorithm in\") OR (\"in pythons python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder and object algorithm in ) OR ( in pythons python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder and object algorithm in") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))*.