Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder and coverage discourse function" » "coder and governance discourse function" (Expand search), "coder and corporate discourse function" (Expand search), "coder and lover's discourse function" (Expand search), "coder and coverage discourse functions" (Expand search), "coder and coverage discourse functional" (Expand search), "coder and coverage discursive function" (Expand search), "coder and cover discourse function" (Expand search), "code and coverage discourse function" (Expand search), "codes and coverage discourse function" (Expand search), "poder and coverage discourse function" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder and coverage discourse function\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder and coverage discourse function ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder and coverage discourse function") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.