Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder and coding is coverage" » "coder and coding its coverage" (Expand search), "coder and coding in coverage" (Expand search), "coder and coding s coverage" (Expand search), "coder and coping is coverage" (Expand search), "coder and cooling is coverage" (Expand search), "coder and cooking is coverage" (Expand search), "code and coding is coverage" (Expand search), "codes and coding is coverage" (Expand search), "poder and coding is coverage" (Expand search), "coder and coding ts coverage" (Expand search), "coder and coding its1 coverage" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder and coding is coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder and coding is coverage\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder and coding is coverage ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder and coding is coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.