Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder allocation using loss program" » "power allocation using loss program" (Expand search), "order allocation using loss program" (Expand search), "over allocation using loss program" (Expand search), "coder application using loss program" (Expand search), "coder allocation in loss program" (Expand search), "coder allocation and loss program" (Expand search), "coder allocation using los programas" (Expand search), "coder allocation using 5s program" (Expand search), "coder allocation using floss program" (Expand search), "coder allocation using less program" (Expand search), "coder allocation using locus program" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder allocation using loss program\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder allocation using loss program ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder allocation using loss program") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.