Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder allocation using algorithm in" » "power allocation using algorithm in" (Expand search), "order allocation using algorithm in" (Expand search), "over allocation using algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder application using algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder allocation in algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder allocation and algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder allocation using algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder allocation using algorithmic in" (Expand search), "coder allocation dosing algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder allocation using algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder allocation using algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder allocation using algorithm with" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder allocation using algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder allocation using algorithm in\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder allocation using algorithm in ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder allocation using algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.