Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder allocation site example of" » "power allocation site example of" (Expand search), "order allocation site example of" (Expand search), "over allocation site example of" (Expand search), "coder allocation state example of" (Expand search), "coder allocation with example of" (Expand search), "coder allocation system example of" (Expand search), "coder allocation sites examples of" (Expand search), "coder allocation fit example of" (Expand search), "coder allocation simple example of" (Expand search), "coder allocation site sample of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder allocation site example of") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder allocation site example of\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder allocation site example of ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder allocation site example of") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.