Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder allocation scale example from" » "power allocation scale example from" (Expand search), "order allocation scale example from" (Expand search), "over allocation scale example from" (Expand search), "coder location scale example from" (Expand search), "coder allocation space example from" (Expand search), "coder allocation state example from" (Expand search), "coder allocation case example from" (Expand search), "coder allocation square example from" (Expand search), "coder allocation simple example from" (Expand search), "coder allocation scale example of" (Expand search), "coder allocation scale samples from" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder allocation scale example from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder allocation scale example from\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder allocation scale example from ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.